Quick review – Dawes Century SE

Dawes Century SE 2013

One of my colleagues has one of these, albeit a 2012 version.  After work one day we cycled for about 15 miles until we went off in our separate directions and during that time I picked up quite a few helpful comments about the bike.  First of all it’s worth mentioning my colleague, Tony, has run through the winter with me as I was getting ready for a marathon.  We ran together through all kinds of horrible weather and so having a bike ride in perfect conditions around the quiet lanes of Hertfordshire was perfect.

The Dawes Century is billed as an audax type bike.  This means it is a road bike with slightly more forgiving features compared to a hard-core time trial bike.  The frame angles are a little more relaxed and the gearing is wide enough for some light touring.  It is also pitched at around the £1000 mark where the competition is stiff (like the frame itself) and attractive for those thinking of acquiring one through the Cycle to Work scheme.

The 2013 model appears to be a bit of a downgrade from last year, almost certainly to bring the price down.  The most obvious difference is the substitution of the Tiagra groupset down to Sora.  This gives you a triple chain set with 27 gears, all useful.  By the way, I have only ever used the small granny ring on my own bike once or twice in all the thousands of miles I’ve had it but it’s nice to know it’s there – especially after a long day’s cycling.  Sora is a modest groupset in the Shimano scheme of things and doesn’t quite have the same finesse of Tiagra or 105 (or even higher) but it does the job.  My colleague has his eye on upgrading his Tiagra components when they start to wear out and you’re certainly not wasting money by doing this.

The frame is very traditional in being constructed with Reynolds 520, although again this is modest compared to some frame materials, it does a very competent job.  There are useful braze-ons for racks etc and these are neatly done.   It is combing the age-old use of Reynolds tubing, modern components, slightly retro-look which Dawes does quite well these days.  The carbon forks are, of course, very contemporary and contribute to saving a bit of weight and add to the feeling of nimble handling.

What would you change if you were buying again?

I was half expecting a long list of things to upgrade but after a moments pause, he said “not much really”.  The pedals are a cyclist’s personal choice and we’ve already covered the scope for upgrading the drive chain, when the time comes.  Probably the most significant gripe were the handlebars – the original equipment ones were simply too narrow.  Changing these is straight forward enough for anyone with allen keys and a basic tool kit.  Getting the handle bar width right is important and, to a point, down to personal choice but it is reasonable to expect these to be in proportion to the frame size when you buy the bike in the first place.  In spite of that minor issue, it is an opportunity to upgrade the bars for some lighter ones.


A good bike.  Not the lightest but it’s important to keep this in perspective (i.e. what’s the point in fretting over saving a few ounces here or there, when many of us cyclists could do with shedding some surplus weight ourselves!).

The Dawes Century SE is an excellent all-purpose bike.  Having mudguards as standard equipment makes it ideal for day-to-day use as is the comfort of the bike itself.  Being able to attach a pannier rack you could go touring providing you didn’t overload it too much.

This bike is undoubtedly aimed at the UK recreational cyclist who’s a bit of an enthusiast – and there are so many with £1,000 to spend.  I doubt anyone would have many regrets in buying one of these.



This entry was posted in reviews. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Quick review – Dawes Century SE

  1. philipgbell says:

    When I was a young lad! Probably around 1960 ish, my parents who were not well off and strapped for money, bought me a second hand Raleigh bicycle with drop handlebars (Noted because amongst the older community at the time they were less well known!) I was thrilled, but slightly jealous of a few friends who were from better off families and had a few handmade quality bikes. One day I was out near the Grand Union Canal and found someone had dumped a frame which when I picked it up to look at it had a Dawes name on it. My parents were a bit miffed when I took it home and swapped my Raleigh frame for the Dawes one. The frame was a bit scuffed in places but my hybrid bike was a joy to me.

    • doug says:

      Thanks Phil. It’s good that the old names of Dawes and Raleigh have survived, albeit with restructures, being acquired etc.

      And yes you’re absolutely right with Dawes being very desirable. Don’t suppose you still have it by any chance?

      Regards, Doug.

  2. Brad says:

    Totally agree with your review. I also have the 2012 version and done abit of light touring on the bike (1400 mile tour to Italy ) And about 4500>5000 miles total. I must say I love it! I have a carbon road bike which I generally use for the club rides but I find I also take the Dawes out and it keeps up with the others no problem. It’s a do everything bike and the only things that have been changed are the pedals and saddle. The handle bar is a little narrow but after a while I got used to it so didn’t bother changing

    • doug says:

      Hi Brad,

      Glad you like your bike and you’ve clocked up plenty of miles in a short period of time. I’m sure your comment will be helpful and of interest to other people thinking of investing in one of these.

      Regards, Doug.

Leave a Reply to doug Cancel reply